Forward Error Detection
Contents |
(Discuss) Proposed since January 2015. In telecommunication, information theory, and coding theory, forward error correction (FEC) or channel coding[1] is forward error correction example a technique used for controlling errors in data transmission over forward error correction tutorial unreliable or noisy communication channels. The central idea is the sender encodes the message in a forward error correction ppt redundant way by using an error-correcting code (ECC). The American mathematician Richard Hamming pioneered this field in the 1940s and invented the first error-correcting code in
Forward Error Correction Pdf
1950: the Hamming (7,4) code.[2] The redundancy allows the receiver to detect a limited number of errors that may occur anywhere in the message, and often to correct these errors without retransmission. FEC gives the receiver the ability to correct errors without needing a reverse channel to request retransmission of data, but at backward error correction the cost of a fixed, higher forward channel bandwidth. FEC is therefore applied in situations where retransmissions are costly or impossible, such as one-way communication links and when transmitting to multiple receivers in multicast. FEC information is usually added to mass storage devices to enable recovery of corrupted data, and is widely used in modems. FEC processing in a receiver may be applied to a digital bit stream or in the demodulation of a digitally modulated carrier. For the latter, FEC is an integral part of the initial analog-to-digital conversion in the receiver. The Viterbi decoder implements a soft-decision algorithm to demodulate digital data from an analog signal corrupted by noise. Many FEC coders can also generate a bit-error rate (BER) signal which can be used as feedback to fine-tune the analog receiving electronics. The noisy-channel coding theorem establishes bounds on the theoretical maximum information transfer rate of a channel with some given noise level. Some advan
of Block code is BCH code. As other block code, BCH encodes k data bits into n code bits by adding n-k parity checking bits for the purpose of detecting and checking the errors. Given the length of the codes is forward error correction 3/4 for any integer m¡Ý3, we will have t (where t<), is the bound of the error
Forward Error Correction Rate
correction. That is, BCH can correct any combination of errors (burst or separate) fewer than t in the n-bit-codes. The number of parity
Forward Error Correction In Data Communication
checking bits is n-k¡Ümt. An important concept for BCH is Galois Fields (GF), which is a finite set of elements on which two binary addition and multiplication can be defined. For any prime number p there is GF(p) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_error_correction and GF(is called extended field of GF(p). We often use GF(in BCH code. A GF can be constructed over a primitive polynomial such as (The construction and arithmetic of GF are in ¡°Error Control Coding¡±, by Shu Lin). Usually, GF table records all the variables, including expressions for the elements, minimal polynomial, and generator polynomial. By referring to the table, we can locate a proper generator polynomial for encoder. For example, when (n, k, t)=(15, 7, 2), a http://www.ecs.umass.edu/ece/koren/FaultTolerantSystems/simulator/BCH/FEC.htm possible generator is . If we have a data stream, the codeword would be and have the style of . The decoder of BCH is complicated because it has to locate and correct the errors. Suppose we have a received codeword, then , where, v(x) is correct codeword and e(x) is the error. First, we must compute a syndrome vector s=, which can be achieved by calculating, where, H is parity-check matrix and can be defined as: . Here,is the element of the GF field and can be located in the GF table. With syndrome, error-location polynomial can be determined. Berkekamp¡¯s iterative algorithm is one of solutions to calculate the error-location polynomial. By finding roots of, the location numbers for the errors will be achieved. Usage The program is developed with Java applet. Basically, the implementation involves three steps: Encoder, Error adding, Decoder. ¡¤ Encoder m and t are available for adjusting. As mentioned above, the codeword length will be. t is the bound of error correction. With m and t being settled, the length of data bits is k=n-mt. Although the program itself has no boundary for m, considering the display limitation, m will be set between 3 and 7. The range checking for m and t are available, if m and t are set to unreasonable values, a red color will b
J. Crowcroft Cambridge Univ. December 2002 The Use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) in Reliable Multicast Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This memo describes the use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) codes to efficiently provide and/or augment reliability https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3453 for one-to-many reliable data transport using IP multicast. One of the key properties of FEC codes in this context is the ability to use the same packets containing FEC data to simultaneously repair different packet loss patterns at multiple receivers. Different classes of FEC codes and some of their basic properties are described and terminology relevant to implementing FEC in a reliable multicast protocol is introduced. Examples are provided of possible abstract formats for packets carrying FEC. Luby, et. al. Informational [Page 1] RFC 3453 FEC in Reliable Multicast December 2002 Table of Contents 1. Rationale and Overview . . . . . . forward error . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Application of FEC codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. FEC Codes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1. Simple codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2. Small block FEC codes. . . . . forward error correction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3. Large block FEC codes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.4. Expandable FEC codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.5. Source blocks with variable length source symbols. . . . . 13 3. Security Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4. Intellectual Property Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 5. Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 7. Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 8. Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1. Rationale and Overview There are many ways to provide reliability for transmission protocols. A common method is to use ARQ, automatic request for retransmission. With ARQ, receivers use a back channel to the sender to send requests for retransmission of lost packets. ARQ works well for one-to-one reliable protocols, as evidenced by the pervasive success of TCP/IP. ARQ has also been an effective reliability tool for one-to-many reliability protocols, and in particular for some reliable IP multicast protocols. However, for one-to-very-many reliability protocols, ARQ has limitation
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:54:23 GMT by s_ac5 (squid/3.5.20)