Memory Allocation Error. Errcode = 6338
as "Not enough memory for full text indexing or search" Full Text; Index; FTI; Search; Not enough memory Technote (troubleshooting) Problem Full-text Search is a service that can be utilized by a Lotus Notes user, an agent, a browser, another server, etc. "Not enough memory" errors indicate a memory resource is being consumed at a rate that exceeds what is available. On a heavily loaded server, this lack of available memory exposes other functional areas to memory resource issues. Those tasks or processes that are less robust when such resource limitations are encountered, fail to recover. This eventually leads to server instability. Queries performed through HTTP are particularly vulnerable, given the JVM also requires significant memory resources within the same process. The most common error messages seen when a search fails with memory issues at the GTR level are Full Text message: Memory allocation error. errcode = 3301 and/or Full Text message: Memory allocation error. errcode = 256: Not enough memory for full text indexing or search. The GTR (General Text Retrieval) is the search engine employed by FTSearch. Symptom Complex queries are more likely to consume large amounts of memory and expose this type of memory allocation failure. The full text query syntax is rich with options, but in certain combinations, with enough content to search through, memory resources can be exhausted. Wild card operators are particularly vulnerable. This type of scenario may be exacerbated with an increasing number of sessions utilizing similar queries. In a heavily loaded server environment, memory resources are exhausted. The example query below would be typical of the type of syntax usage sufficient to cause such an error: [Field1] = "aaa*" OR [Field1] = "bbb*" OR [Field1] = "ccc*" OR [Field1] = "ddd*" OR [Field1] = "eee*" OR [Field1] = "fff*" OR [Field1] = "ggg*" OR [Field1] = "hhh*" OR [Field1] = "iii*" OR [Field1] = "jjj*" OR [Field1] = "kkk*" OR [Field1] = "lll*" OR [Field1] = "mmm*" OR [Field1] = "nnn*" OR [Field1] = "ooo*" OR [Field1] = "ppp*" OR [Field1] = "qqq*" OR [Field1] = "rrr*" OR [Field1] = "sss*" OR [Field1] = "ttt*" OR [Field1] = "uuu*" OR [Field1] = "vvv*" OR [Field1] = "www*" OR [Field1] = "xxx*" OR [Fiel
Training Support Forums & community Events Rational Tivoli WebSphere Java technology Linux Open source SOA and Web services Web development XML My developerWorks About dW Submit content Feedback developerWorks>Lotus>Forums & community>IBM Lotus Notes/Domino 8.5 Forum (includes Lotus Notes Traveler) IBM Lotus Notes/Domino 8.5 Forum (includes Lotus Notes Traveler) Sign in to participate Previous Next Subject: Full Text Indexing error Feedback Type: Problem Product Area: Domino Server Technical Area: Error Message Platform: Windows Release: 8.5.2 Reproducible: Always When e message is delivered to a users mailfile I see in the console and in the log.nsf following errors: 08/29/2011 08:35:18 AM Full Text message: Memory allocation http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21634309 error. errcode = 6338 08/29/2011 08:35:18 AM Error full text indexing document NT00076322 D:\notes\data\mail\mailfilename>.ft (rc=3892) Not enough memory for Full Text Indexing or Search 08/29/2011 08:35:20 AM Error full text indexing mail\
9.0.1 Domino Blog Template Domino8.5 Fixpack Fritzbox Fun IBM ConnectED iNotes iOS iPhone Issue JVM keyring kyrtool Linux LiveText MIME New Technologies News Notes Notes9 notes.ini NSD nshrun Odd Things OSX Performance POODLE private http://blog.nashcom.de/nashcomblog.nsf/dx/new-performance-problem-with-domino-on-windows-2008-64bit.htm?opendocument&comments SAI Sametime SAML Scalability Security Server Availability Index SLES SMTP Solaris SPAM SpamGeek SPR Start Script Symphony T-Mobile Tip Tips TLS Tool Traveler Ubuntu Widget Win64 Daniel Nashed's BlogIssuePerformanceWin64New Performance Problem with Domino on Windows 2008 64bitDaniel Nashed 1 October 2010 18:05:16Since Domino is supported on Windows 64bit there have been a couple of issues in the performance area. Most of them have been already technoted and IBM has build memory allocation work-arounds. For example the problem with the large amount of memory used by the cache manager which competed with memory allocations by Domino. To prevent the cache manager from using too much physical memory IBM uses the system call SetSystemFileCacheSize(..) (ref: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa965240%28VS.85%29.aspx). But it turned out this only fixed part of the underlying issue. To understand what is going wrong you have to understand how the Windows Cache Manager memory allocation error. works internally. How the Windows Cache Manager Works The Windows Cache Manager uses Virtual Memory to store the cache pages one by one for each open file in block sizes of 256 kb. Allocated pages stay in Virtual Memory for a while depending on multiple factors. The most important factor is if the file is still open by any running process. The Virtual Memory Manager manages the physical memory used for the cache. The amount of memory is the working set of the cache manager specified via the SetSystemFileCacheSize Windows API call. Domino 8.5.x sets this value by default to 30% of the physical memory which is a good starting point. But on the other hand, if the Virtual Memory for the file-system cache becomes larger and larger the Virtual Memory manager will throw out many pages but keeps the open files still in the Virtual Memory of the File-System cache. IMHO this is not how a cache manager should be implemented. But in normal conditions this is still not a big issue because the file-system cache should not grow too much. But this becomes an issue when a lot of data needs to be cached. The biggest limitation we ran into the 1 TB limit for
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:42:04 GMT by s_wx1011 (squid/3.5.20)