Bind Failed Error 10048
Contents |
SQL Server 2014 Express resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and reference ipmsg bind error 10048 Dev centers Retired content Samples We’re sorry. The content you requested has
Redis Bind Error 10048
been removed. You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users socket bind error 10048 FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Asked by: Error 10048 in bind() Archived Forums # > .NET Framework Networking and Communication Question 0 Sign in to vote Hello, My 10048 error application a simple MDI application.Take data in serial port and send it to another computer using tcp/ip .In the first iterartion every thing is fine.Both server and client systems works well.Then if the server is turned of off(disconnect using socket.close() method) and then client is also closed .without closing the application if i start open the socket and execute socket.bind() method , the
Winsock Error 10048 Address Already In Use
exception 10048thanks in advance.cheers,watashi Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:12 AM All replies 0 Sign in to vote It means that yProxy is unable to bind to the Local (Proxy) Port that you have configured. That port is probably already in use. Wednesday, September 05, 2007 11:54 AM 0 Sign in to vote Hello, Thnks for u r reply.but as i hv stated the same application was using that ip and port and are closed using close() method.And then when try to open the same ip and port which was closed then i m getting the above error. Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:27 AM 0 Sign in to vote The problem is that binding and unbinding to endpoints is a costly operation for the Operating System.. And it takes a while before it is performed... If you want to speed up this process you'll have to find a way to pass in the option SO_REUSEADDR (i can't remember the .net equivalent right now) to notify the OS that the resource has to be cleaned up faster (and thus make it available faster)...serverSocket.SetSocketOption(SocketOptionLevel.IP, SocketOptionName.ReuseAddress, true);(Another interesting setting could be HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Tcp
ease planning, as well. Free PRTG Download >> What is this? This knowledgebase contains questions and answers about PRTG Network Monitor and network monitoring in general. You are invited to bind error 10048 in ip messenger get involved by asking and answering questions! Learn more Top Tags 5705× prtg error 10048 in function bind address already in use 1832× snmp 1458× sensor 928× wmi 619× notifications 460× maps View all Tags How can I solve an error "10048
10048 Socket Error
(Address already in use.)" in Webserver Stress Tool? Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down In Webserver Stress Tool, I get an error message # 10048 Address already in use. Where does it come from and http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-BZ/77af3fe1-b322-4bf3-9aad-ce4da62d7457 how can I solve this issue? error networking registry webserver-stress-tool Created on Feb 24, 2010 9:05:50 AM by Daniel Zobel [Paessler Support] Last change on Jul 21, 2010 1:54:37 PM by Daniel Zobel [Paessler Support] Permalink 1 Reply Accepted Answer Votes:0 Your Vote: Up Down Avoiding "10048 (Address already in use.)" Errors in Webserver Stress Tool For high traffic scenarios this message shows a problem on the workstation running https://kb.paessler.com/en/topic/1213-how-can-i-solve-an-error-10048-address-already-in-use-in-webserver-stress-tool Webserver Stress Tool. The IP stack can't create additional outgoing TCP/IP connections because it runs out of available socket numbers for the IP address(es) that you have configured in Webstress. This error occurs when your workstation cannot allocate new sockets. On Windows the default limitation is 5000 - 1024 open sockets (5000 is the default max user port setting and the first 1024 ports are reserved). You can increase the default maximum socket value in the registry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/SYSTEM/CurrentControlSet/Services/Tcpip/Parameters and add or modify the MaxUserPort value. See Also Microsoft article: "When you try to connect from TCP ports greater than 5000 you receive the error 'WSAENOBUFS (10055)'" The Cable Guy article: "Windows TCP/IP Ephemeral, Reserved, and Blocked Port Behavior" Add comment Created on Feb 24, 2010 9:10:15 AM by Daniel Zobel [Paessler Support] Last change on Sep 1, 2015 8:07:43 AM by Erhard Mikulik [Paessler Support] Permalink Please log in or register to enter your reply. Disclaimer: The information in the Paessler Knowledge Base comes without warranty of any kind. Use at your own risk. Before applying any instructions please exercise proper system administrator housekeeping. You must make sure that a proper backup of all your data is available. © 1998 - 2016 Paes
clients - about a dozen of them. When I check the nsclient log, I see the following: bind failed: 10048: Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. http://forums.nsclient.org/t/bind-failed-10048-error/2486 When I use a port utility to check the open ports, it shows that "System" with 100's of 5666 and 12489 ports in CLOSE_WAIT status, even though I stop the nsclientpp service. I can kill those, but there is always at least one 5666 and 12489 port in listening state, held open by System, which I can't kill. Thus the error above when attempting to start NSClient. I confirmed error 10048 the NSclientpp service was off during the checks and attempts to close all the 5666 and 12489 ports. This originally only affected one server - now at least 12 have this problem. Is there anything I can do to kill that port short of rebooting? Also, is there any way I can tweak nsclient++ so this doesn't keep happening? Thanks for any and all assistance, Mike legacyforumuser 2009-07-16 bind error 10048 23:27:06 UTC #2 Forgot to mention... We do not have anything using that port. The port stays open until the server is rebooted. Is seems to be left hanging since the last stop of the NSClientpp service, since I usually catch this problem upon restarting the service. Thanks! Mike MickeM 2009-07-17 19:13:00 UTC #3 Humm, nothing I have encounterd really. It might be such especially a problem in the NSCA module (discovered recently9 could "hang" socket threads, but I am doubt full if this is the case here... Anyways, I would need a reproducable scenario to debug such an issue. // Michael Medin legacyforumuser 2009-07-17 23:42:54 UTC #4 Mickem, Meanwhile, can you suggest any ways we can force the "System" process to close those two ports? We have about 12 critical servers we both can't launch Nagios on, or reboot at this time, which we really need to monitor. Thanks Mike MickeM 2009-07-19 09:11:05 UTC #5 I have never experience this issue, which is why I find this strange. Usually windows closes all resource when it closes the program allocating them.Thus when the program dies they should have been released. I assume you have verified that no processes are running?(nothing under NSClient++ in tas