Error Sending To Interface Address 10049
Address: 10049" DS Forums RegisterFAQToday's PostsSearchRules My DS Account No account yet? Create one now!OR Login with Digital Spy account "Error Sending to Interface Address: 10049" Search Forums Show Threads Show Posts Advanced Search Go to Page... Thread Tools Search this Thread 08-06-2004, 23:22 #1 peterfoster Forum Member Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 711 "Error Sending to Interface Address: 10049" I have installed the software but cannot connect. I get the above message when I right click "log viewer". Could someone kindly suggest a reason, please. I have a new 3.06gb Dell running xp home edition. I have downloaded all available updates from "Windows Updates". The product I am installing (to enable me to connect to my office network from home) is SonicWALL VPN Client "SafeNet SoftRemote 8.0.0 Build 10". I have a wireless Telewest Blueyonder Broadband Connection. The wireless USB adapter I have is the Netgear MA101 (The Log Viewer does recognise this piece of kit as follows- "Interface added xx.xx.xx.xx/xxx.xxx.xxx.x on LAN "Netgear MA101 USB Adapter") When I installed the VPN Client I got the "This software has not passed Windows logo testing..... and we recommend that you stop this installation...." message but I pressed the "install it anyway" button. In fact I had to press this button 5 times to get the software to install. I have a Norton Utilities 2004 Personal Firewall. As part of the installation instructions for the wireless Blueyonder Broadband device, I had to turn off xp's own software for controlling wireless devices by going into "Wireless Networks" and un-ticking "Use windows to configure my wireless settings". Will the sonic software work with xp home edition or do I need xp professional? Apologies if this post has not been directed at the correct forum; it just seemed to "fall between three stools"
for Help Receive Real-Time Help Create a Freelance Project Hire for a Full Time Job Ways to Get Help Ask a Question Ask for Help Receive Real-Time Help Create a Freelance Project Hire for a Full Time Job Ways to Get Help Expand Search Submit Close Search Login Join Today Products BackProducts Gigs Live Careers Vendor Services Groups Website Testing Store Headlines Experts Exchange > Questions > Juniper Netscreen Remote VPN gettting errors 10049 when attempting to connect Want to Advertise Here? Solved Juniper Netscreen Remote VPN gettting errors 10049 when attempting to connect Posted on 2010-07-13 VPN 1 Verified Solution 2 Comments 944 Views Last Modified: 2012-05-09 I am using Juniper Netscreen http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=130283 Remote VPN Client v 10.8.10 (Build 4) on a Win XP SP3 Computer as a remote. When attmepting to connect I get errors: "Error sending t driver registration 10049" and "Error sending to interface address: 10049" This is true for this machine only; all othter remote computers can connect just fine. The techs at Juniper say it is not an issue they can address but rather it is an issue with https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/26327205/Juniper-Netscreen-Remote-VPN-gettting-errors-10049-when-attempting-to-connect.html Windows. Any suggestions? 0 Question by:gbm33 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google Best Solution bygbm33 I have determined that the issue is with Trend Micro Personal Firewall. First I disabled it which allowed the connection to go through. Then I fiddled with the Allow list of programs to allow Net Screen Go to Solution 2 Comments LVL 10 Overall: Level 10 VPN 2 Message Expert Comment by:jramsier2010-07-13 Yeah Juniper support has been sucking. Is it happening on other computers? if so i would make Juniper fix it. See if this helps: http://www.experts-exchange.com/Software/System_Utilities/Remote_Access/VPN/Q_21982838.html 0 Message Accepted Solution by:gbm332010-07-13 I have determined that the issue is with Trend Micro Personal Firewall. First I disabled it which allowed the connection to go through. Then I fiddled with the Allow list of programs to allow Net Screen access. All is well now. 0 Write Comment First Name Please enter a first name Last Name Please enter a last name Email We will never share this with anyone. Comment Submit Your Comment By clicking you are agreeing to Experts Exchange's Terms of Use. Featured Post Find Ransomware Secrets With All-Source Analysis Promoted by Recorded Future Ransomware has become a major concern for organizations; its prevalence has grown due to past successes achieved by threat actors. While each ransomwar
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11970069/winsock-connect-fails-with-error-10049-when-using-localhost-127-0-0-1 you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring https://fogbugz.bitvise.com/default.asp?WinSSHD.1.214.13 developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a error sending community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up winsock: connect fails with error 10049 when using localhost (127.0.0.1) up vote 2 down vote favorite i wrote a class encapsulating some of the winsock functions to imitate a simple TCP socket for error sending to my needs... When i try to run a simple connect-and-send-data-to-server test the "client" fails on its call to connect with the error code of 10049 (WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL) connect function on MSDN What I am doing is (code below): Server: Create a Server Socket -> Bind it to Port 12345 Put the Socket in listen mode Call accept Client Create a socket -> Bind it to a random port Call Connect: connect to localhost, port 12345 => the call to connect fails with Error 10049, as described above Here is the main function including the "server": HANDLE hThread = NULL; Inc::CSocketTCP ServerSock; Inc::CSocketTCP ClientSock; try { ServerSock.Bind(L"", L"12345"); ServerSock.Listen(10); //Spawn the senders-thread hThread = (HANDLE)_beginthreadex(nullptr, 0, Procy, nullptr, 0, nullptr); //accept ServerSock.Accept(ClientSock); //Adjust the maximum packet size ClientSock.SetPacketSize(100); //receive data std::wstring Data; ClientSock.Receive(Data); std::wcout << "Received:\t" << Data << std::endl; } catch(std::exception& e) {... Client thread function unsigned int WINAPI Procy(void* p) { Sleep(1500); try{ Inc::CSocketTCP SenderSock; SenderSock.Bind(L"", L"123456")
could not be controlled within abilities of this support system. For any technical or licensing inquiries about Bitvise SSH Server, please open a new support case. Any information you find herein is outdated, and not applicable to our latest software versions. WinSSHD fails to start - error 10049: Service terminates upon bo I'm evaluating Winsshd. Every time I reboot my computer wsshd service starts but then terminates with the following error:[015] WinSSHD 3.26: Service terminated by exception: Socket: bind operation failed with error 10049If I login wsshd can be (re)started manually without any problems. Since the service actually starts changing the recovery options for the service gives no effect.I'm running Win XP sp1 with all available updates, startup type for service is automatic, run as local system account.Please advice? data Thursday, July 01, 2004 Deleting… Approving… Thank you for your inquiry. For future reference - see below for how to get easy help for Windows error codes.CODE C:\>net helpmsg 10049The requested address is not valid in its context.You have most likely changed the WinSSHD default settings, where the listening interface is configured by default as 0.0.0.0 (listen on all interfaces). You have possibly changed this to an invalid address, or to an interface which since then has changed its IP address, or to an interface which is not yet enabled at boot time.Change the WinSSHD listening address back to 0.0.0.0, or set it to an interface which is valid at boot time, and WinSSHD will start correctly. denis bider Friday, July 02, 2004 Deleting… Approving… The interface IS available at boot time, it is the only interface (manual restart does the work, maybye wsshd starts before interfaces come up properly)But never the less, thanks for the prompt reply. It did solve our problem. Order will be sent soon :) data Friday, July 02, 2004 Deleting… Approving… If anyone else has the same problem - configured a listening interface that is valid but WinSSHD reports error 10049 at boot time - let me know. Perhaps initialization of th