Attribution Error Bias
Contents |
opinions of experts. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (December 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In psychology, an
Attribution Bias Definition
attribution bias or attributional bias is a cognitive bias that refers to attributional bias examples the systematic errors made when people evaluate or try to find reasons for their own and others' behaviors.[1][2][3] People fundamental attribution error and the self-serving bias constantly make attributions regarding the cause of their own and others' behaviors; however, attributions do not always accurately mirror reality. Rather than operating as objective perceivers, people are prone to perceptual
Correspondence Bias And Fundamental Attribution Error
errors that lead to biased interpretations of their social world.[4][5] Attribution biases were first discussed in the 1950s and 60s by psychologists such as Fritz Heider, who studied attribution theory.[1] Other psychologists, such as Harold Kelley and Ed Jones expanded Heider's early work by identifying conditions under which people are more or less likely to make different types of attributions. Attribution biases
Correspondence Bias Vs Fundamental Attribution Error
are present in everyday life, and therefore are an important and relevant topic to study. For example, when a driver cuts us off, we are more likely to attribute blame to the reckless driver (e.g., "What a jerk!"), rather than situational circumstances (e.g., "Maybe they were in a rush and didn’t notice me"). Additionally, there are many different types of attribution biases, such as the ultimate attribution error, fundamental attribution error, actor-observer bias, and hostile attribution bias. Each of these biases describes a specific tendency that people exhibit when reasoning about the cause of different behaviors. Since the early work, researchers have continued to examine how and why people exhibit biased interpretations of social information.[2][6] Many different types of attribution biases have been identified, and more recent psychological research on these biases has examined how attribution biases can subsequently affect emotions and behavior.[7][8][9] Contents 1 History 1.1 Attribution theory 1.1.1 Fritz Heider 1.1.2 Jones & Davis 1.1.3 Harold Kelley 1.2 Biased attributions 1.2.1 Cognitive explanation 1.2.2 Motivational explanation 2 Current theory 3 Limitations of the theory 4 Types 4.1 Fundamental attribution error 4.2
messages) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original actor observer bias fundamental attribution error research should be removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove
Fundamental Attribution Bias Examples
this template message) This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding fundamental attribution error definition secondary or tertiary sources. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In social psychology, the fundamental attribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_bias error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics of the agent (character or intention), rather than external factors, in explaining another person's behavior in a given situation. This contrasts with interpreting one's own behavior, where situational factors are more easily recognized and can be taken https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error into account. Contents 1 Examples 2 Details 3 Classic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967) 4 Explanations 5 Cultural differences in the error 6 Versus correspondence bias 7 See also 7.1 Cognitive biases 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Examples[edit] As a simple example, consider a situation where Alice, a driver, is about to pass through an intersection. Her light turns green and she begins to accelerate, but another car drives through the red light and crosses in front of her. The fundamental attribution error may lead her to think that the driver of the other car was an unskilled or reckless driver. This will be an error if the other driver had a good reason for running the light, such as rushing a patient to the hospital. If this is the case and Alice had been driving the other car, she would have understood that the situation called for speed at the cost of safety, but when seeing it from the outside she was inclined to believe that the behavior of the other driver ref
Age Paranormal Science & Philosophy Supernatural Other Writings Unnatural Acts blog Skeptimedia Mass Media Funk Mass Media Bunk What's the Harm? Newsletter Archives Internet Bunk Too good to be true Skeptical Essays Book Reviews Suburban Myths In Memoriam Other Resources Mysteries http://skepdic.com/attribution.html and Science for Kids Podcast: Unnatural Virtue archive A Skeptic's Halloween Editor's Notes Get involved Future https://wattersattribution.wordpress.com/bias-in-attribution/ Topics? Permission to print Site Statistics From Abracadabra to Zombies | View All a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z attribution biases Human behavior can be understood as issuing from "internal" factors or personal characteristics--such as motives, intentions, or personality traits--and from attribution error "external" factors--such as the physical or social environment and other factors deemed out of one's personal control. Self-serving creatures that we are, we tend to attribute our own successes to our intelligence, knowledge, skill, perseverance, and other positive personal traits. Our failures are blamed on bad luck, sabotage by others, a lost lucky charm, and other such things. These attribution biases are referred to as the dispositional attribution bias and the situational attribution bias.They are applied in fundamental attribution error reverse when we try to explain the actions of others. Others succeed because they're lucky or have connections and they fail because they're stupid, wicked, or didn't try hard enough. We may tend to attribute the behaviors of others to their intentions because it is cognitively easier to do so. We often have no idea about the situational factors that might influence another person or cause them to do what they do. We can usually easily imagine, however, a personal motive or personality trait that could account for most human actions. We usually have little difficulty in seeing when situational factors are at play in affecting our own behavior. In fact, people tend to over-emphasize the role of the situation in their own behaviors and under-emphasize the role of their own personal motives or personality traits. Social psychologists refer to this tendency as the actor-observer bias. One lesson here is that we should be careful when interpreting the behavior of others. What might appear to be laziness, dishonesty, or stupidity might be better explained by situational factors of which we are ignorant. Another lesson is that we might be giving ourselves more credit for our actions than we deserve. The situation may have driven us more than we admit. Maybe we "just did what anybody would do in that situation" or maybe we were just lucky. We may
of events, which leaves the event subject to people's point of view and bias. - Attributions ultimately represent guesswork about the causes of events, and people might even guess that the cause of their own behavior incorrectly. LET US LOOK AT SOME EXAMPLES OF BIASES IN ATTRIBUTION Actor-Observer Bias Your view of your own behavior can be different from the view of someone else's who's looking at you Fundamental Attribution Error: refers to observers' bias in favor of internal attributions in explaining others' behavior. Example: If you get angry because money on your bank account is gone and look like your raging, someone who is observing you will probably think their are internal attributions that cause you to do that, like an easy temper. In reality, you could be a calm and caring person who's having a bad day. Actors favor external attributions for their behavior, whereas observers favor the same behavior internally. Defensive Attribution A tendency to blame victims for their misfortune, so that one feels less likely to be victimized in a similar way. Hindsight bias contributes to this tendency, but blaming victims also helps people maintain their belief that they live in a just world, where they are unlikely to experience the same troubles. Defensive attributions can lead to unwarranted derogation of victims of misfortune. Examples: Burglary victims can be blamed for their carelessness of protecting their house; poor people may be viewed as lazy. Self-Serving Bias The self-serving bias in attribution comes into play when people attempt to explain success and failure. The self-serving bias is the tendency to attribute one's successes to personal factors and one's failures to situational errors In explaining failure , the usual actor-observer biases become apparent because actors tend to make external attributions, blaming their failures on unfavorable situational factors, while observers attribute the same failures to the actor's personal shortcomings. In the end each per