Attribution Error Experiments
Contents |
messages) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to fundamental attribution error experiment remove this template message) This article relies too much on references to primary sources.
Fundamental Attribution Error Theory
Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn self attribution error how and when to remove this template message) In social psychology, the fundamental attribution error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal cognitive dissonance experiment characteristics of the agent (character or intention), rather than external factors, in explaining another person's behavior in a given situation. This contrasts with interpreting one's own behavior, where situational factors are more easily recognized and can be taken into account. Contents 1 Examples 2 Details 3 Classic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967) 4 Explanations 5 Cultural differences in the error 6 Versus correspondence bias 7 See also 7.1 Cognitive biases
Halo Effect Experiment
8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Examples[edit] As a simple example, consider a situation where Alice, a driver, is about to pass through an intersection. Her light turns green and she begins to accelerate, but another car drives through the red light and crosses in front of her. The fundamental attribution error may lead her to think that the driver of the other car was an unskilled or reckless driver. This will be an error if the other driver had a good reason for running the light, such as rushing a patient to the hospital. If this is the case and Alice had been driving the other car, she would have understood that the situation called for speed at the cost of safety, but when seeing it from the outside she was inclined to believe that the behavior of the other driver reflected their fundamental nature (having poor driving skills or a reckless attitude). Another example relates to a slippery path: A traveler carefully walks down a sloped path in the rain. The traveler slips and falls. The traveler believes this is a slippery path. The traveler continues more carefully. At the bottom of the slope, the traveler rests while waiting for the rain to stop. The traveler s
opinions of experts. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (December 2012) (Learn how and when to remove confirmation bias experiment this template message) In psychology, an attribution bias or attributional bias social facilitation experiment is a cognitive bias that refers to the systematic errors made when people evaluate or try
Self Fulfilling Prophecy Experiment
to find reasons for their own and others' behaviors.[1][2][3] People constantly make attributions regarding the cause of their own and others' behaviors; however, attributions do not always accurately https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error mirror reality. Rather than operating as objective perceivers, people are prone to perceptual errors that lead to biased interpretations of their social world.[4][5] Attribution biases were first discussed in the 1950s and 60s by psychologists such as Fritz Heider, who studied attribution theory.[1] Other psychologists, such as Harold Kelley and Ed Jones expanded Heider's early work https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribution_bias by identifying conditions under which people are more or less likely to make different types of attributions. Attribution biases are present in everyday life, and therefore are an important and relevant topic to study. For example, when a driver cuts us off, we are more likely to attribute blame to the reckless driver (e.g., "What a jerk!"), rather than situational circumstances (e.g., "Maybe they were in a rush and didn’t notice me"). Additionally, there are many different types of attribution biases, such as the ultimate attribution error, fundamental attribution error, actor-observer bias, and hostile attribution bias. Each of these biases describes a specific tendency that people exhibit when reasoning about the cause of different behaviors. Since the early work, researchers have continued to examine how and why people exhibit biased interpretations of social information.[2][6] Many different types of attribution biases have been identified, and more recent psychological research on these biases has examined how attribution biases can subsequently affect emotions and behavior.[7][8][9] Contents 1 History
Pages Publications Pages attribution error Browse by Subject How to Subscribe Free Trials Sign in African American StudiesAfrican StudiesAmerican LiteratureAnthropologyArt HistoryAtlantic HistoryBiblical StudiesBritish and Irish LiteratureBuddhismChildhood StudiesChinese StudiesCinema and Media StudiesClassicsCommunicationCriminologyEcologyEducationEnvironmental ScienceEvolutionary BiologyGeographyHinduismInternational LawInternational RelationsIslamic StudiesJewish StudiesLatin American StudiesLatino StudiesLinguisticsManagementMedieval StudiesMilitary HistoryMusicPhilosophyPolitical SciencePsychologyPublic HealthRenaissance fundamental attribution error and ReformationSocial WorkSociologyVictorian LiteratureBrowse All SubjectsClose Login Username Password Forgotten your password? Library Card # Login with your Library Card » Login with Athens/Access Management Federation » Don't have an account? In This Article Fundamental Attribution Error/Correspondence Bias IntroductionGeneral OverviewsBackground ReferencesJournalsDispositionism Direct Critiques and Challenges Indirect Critiques and Challenges Paradigms that Investigate FAE/CB Attitude Attribution The Quiz Game The Silent Interview Moral Attribution Ability Attribution Theoretical Explanations of FAE/CB Inadequate Weight to Situations Perceiver Expectations Automatic Inferences Controlled Adjustment Moderators of FAE/CB Manipulations of Situational Factors Individual Differences Cultural Differences Applications Back to top Related Articles about About Related Articles close popup Attribution Theory Social Cognition Stereotypes Trait Perspective Other Subject Areas African American St