Attribution Error Ultimate
Contents |
This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article
Fundamental Attribution Error
needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations ultimate attribution error examples to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) ultimate attribution error vs fundamental attribution error (Learn how and when to remove this template message) The ultimate attribution error is a group-level attribution error that offers an explanation for how one person views different causes of negative and positive behavior
Ultimate Attribution Error Quizlet
in ingroup and outgroup members.[1] Contents 1 Definition 2 Overview 3 Explaining away positive behavior of outgroup members 3.1 Exceptional case 3.2 Luck or special advantage 3.3 Highly motivated 3.4 Situational 4 Evidence 5 See also 6 References Definition[edit] Ultimate attribution error is the tendency to internally attribute negative outgroup and positive ingroup behaviour and to externally attribute positive outgroup and negative ingroup behaviour. So in other words, ultimate
The Ultimate Attribution Error Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis Of Prejudice
attribution error arises as a way to explain an outgroup's negative behaviour as flaws in their personality, and to explain an outgroup's positive behaviour as a result of chance or circumstance. It is also the belief that positive acts performed by ingroup members are as a result of their personality, whereas, if an ingroup member behaves negatively (which is believed to be rare), it is a result of situational factors.[2] Overview[edit] The ultimate attribution error was first established by Thomas F. Pettigrew in his 1979 publication "The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice".[1] As the title suggests, the ultimate attribution error is a theoretical extension of Gordon Allport's work in attribution theory. The ultimate attribution error is a systematic patterning of intergroup misattributions shaped in part by one's prejudices. Prejudiced individuals are more likely to attribute an outgroup member's negative behaviors to dispositional, internal (possibly genetically determined), causes. These same prejudiced individuals are also more likely to attribute outgroup member's positive behaviours to (a) "exceptional case", (b) fluke or special advantage, (c) high levels of motivation, or (d) situational context causes. Through these explanations, a prejudiced individual may disassociate a positive behavior from an outgroup individual and their group. In comparison, on
News Word of the Day Psychology Journals Psych Writing GRE Psychology Articles ultimate attribution error definition Psych Links Get Into Grad School Advertise Support Psychology Glossary
Define Ultimate Attribution Error
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O ultimate attribution error nedir P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Follow AlleyDog Ultimate Attribution Error The Ultimate Attribution Error was coined by psychologist Thomas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_attribution_error Pettigrew in 1979 to explain why members of the ingroup (“us”) tend to judge members of the outgroup (“them”) so harshly. Pettigrew suggested that when outgroup members behave negatively or undesirably, ingroup members attribute their behavior to dispositional causes, such as genetics, poor character, or poor upbringing, whereas when outgroup members http://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Ultimate%20Attribution%20Error behavior positively, ingroup members attribute that behavior to luck, a special privilege, extreme effort, or some other exception to the rule. When individuals of the ingroup evaluate their own group members, they are more forgiving and make more exceptions for failures and fewer exceptions for successes. This error in thought plays a large role in prejudice and other social biases. See also: Fundamental Attribution Error Add flashcard Cite Random Interested in a Graduate Psychology Degree? You can get free information about Adler University's graduate psychology programs just by answering a few short questions. Get Free Info Word of the Day Get the word of the day delivered to your inbox Where would you like to study Garcia Effect? © 1998-2016, AlleyDog.com. All material within this site is the property of AlleyDog.com. This material may not be reprinted or copied for any reason without the express written consent of AlleyDog.com.
explaining away any positive behavior on their part http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ultimate_attribution_error as being merely circumstantial. This is a way in which the cognitive bias of prejudice is retained, despite evidence against http://psychapprentice.weebly.com/psychology-lexicon/fundamental-attribution-error it being presented. An example of this was found in a study revealing that Hindus observing negative behaviors among Hindus attributed attribution error these behaviors to external factors, while the same behaviors among Muslims were believed to be deficiencies of character. Muslims concluded the same thing about Hindus.[1] [edit] See also No True Scotsman [edit] References ↑ Taylor, D. M; Jaggi (1974). "Ethnocentrism and ultimate attribution error Causal attribution in a South Indian Context". Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 5: 162–171. Retrieved from "http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Ultimate_attribution_error&oldid=1682099" Category: Cognitive biases Personal tools Log in / create account Namespaces Page Talk Variants Views Read Edit Fossil record Actions Search Navigation Main page Recent changes Random page New pages All logs Help support Donate Community Saloon bar To do list What is going on? Best of RationalWiki About RationalWiki Technical support External links Twitter Blog Facebook Tools What links here Related changes Special pages Printable version Permanent link This page was last modified on 10 June 2016, at 00:34. Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all content licensed as indicated by RationalWiki:Copyrights. For concerns on copyright infringement please see: RationalWiki:Copyright violations Privacy policy About RationalWiki Disclaimers
the result of internal disposition, rather than external factors The fundamental attribution error is a form of cognitive bias that we commit when we automatically attribute a person's behavior to their internal disposition or personality. For example, when we get cut off by another driver on the road, it is more likely that we will infer the person to be a bad driver (or a jerk), rather than infer that he or she has had a bad day or is in a hurry.A real-life example of the error is the infamous "47%" statement made by former Republican Party presidential nominee, Mitt Romney. At a private function, Romney said that that 47% of the American population is made up of people who pay no income tax, believe they are "victims," and "are dependent on the government." Romney's quick conclusion that those who do not pay income tax shunresponsibility ignores other aspects of the situation, such as the fact that an large portion of the people who do not pay income tax are college-aged or retired.A variation of the fundamental attribution error is the ultimate attribution error, which is directed towards entire groups and forms the basis of prejudice.References:AllPsych. (2011, November 29).Our View of Self and Others.Retrieved February 9, 2013, from AllPsych Online's website:http://allpsych.com/psychology101/attribution_attraction.html.Sanchez, J. (2012, September 18). The 47% and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Retrieved February 9, 2013, from Cato Institute's website:http://www.cato.org/blog/47-percent-fundamental-attribution-error.Photo Credit:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-v9Y-cwpRbsI/TuFz0vGjthI/AAAAAAAADhU/66OROmPjUq0/s1600/What%2BA%2BJerk.jpg 1 Comment fashion designing in jaipur link 10/3/2013 09:34:17 A variation of the fundamental attribution error is the ultimate attribution error, which is directed towards entire groups and forms the basis of prejudice. Reply Your comment will be posted after it is approved. Leave a Reply. Psychology Lexicon n. the vocabulary of the language of psychology Archives July 2013 February 2013 January 2013 Categories All A Abnormal Psychology Attention And Consciousness B Behavior Biases Brain C Creativity Decision Making Developmental Psychology Discrimination Disorders E Experimental Design F G H I K Learning M Mass Communication Media Memory Memory (Implicit) P Personality Psycholinguistics R S Sleep Social Psychology Sociology T V RSS Feed Create a free website Powered by Create your own free webs