Nt Ioctl Error
Contents |
resources Windows Server 2012 resources Programs MSDN subscriptions Overview Benefits Administrators Students Microsoft Imagine Microsoft Student Partners ISV Startups TechRewards Events smb2 create response error status_object_name_not_found Community Magazine Forums Blogs Channel 9 Documentation APIs and reference
Smb Error Codes
Dev centers Samples Retired content We’re sorry. The content you requested has been removed. You’ll be
Invalid Fid
auto redirected in 1 second. Export (0) Print Expand All MSDN Library Open Specifications Protocols Windows Protocols Technical Documents [MS-CIFS]: Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol
Ioctl Response Error Status_not_found
2 Messages 2.2 Message Syntax 2.2.2 Defined Constants 2.2.2.1 SMB_COM Command Codes 2.2.2.2 Transaction Subcommand Codes 2.2.2.3 Information Level Codes 2.2.2.4 SMB Error Classes and Codes 2.2.2.5 Data Buffer Format Codes Collapse the table of content Expand the table of content This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. 2.2.2.4 SMB cifs error codes Error Classes and Codes This section provides an overview of status codes that can be returned by the SMB commands listed in this document, including mappings between the NTSTATUS codes used in the NT LAN Manager dialect, the SMBSTATUS class/code pairs used in earlier SMB dialects, and common POSIX equivalents. The POSIX error code mappings are based upon those used in the Xenix server implementation. This is not an exhaustive listing and MUST NOT be considered normative. Each command and subcommand description also includes a list of status codes that are returned by CIFS-compliant servers. Individual implementations can return status codes from their underlying operating systems; it is up to the implementer to decide how to interpret those status codes. The listing below is organized by SMBSTATUS Error Class. It shows SMBSTATUS Error Code values and a general description, as well as mappings from NTSTATUS values ([MS-ERREF] section 2.3.1) and POSIX-style error codes where po
[ author ] > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher R. Hertel [mailto:crh at ubiqx.mn.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:22 PM > To: smb2 ioctl Tayade, Nilesh > Cc: Christopher R. Hertel; samba-technical at lists.samba.org > Subject: cifs_mount error codes list Re: About the SMB error codes. > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:13:19PM +0000, Tayade, Nilesh wrote: > fsctl_dfs_get_referrals > Thanks Chris. > > In my case, I received STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST error. The > communication still goes on the same socket after the error is > reported. > > So can I https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee441884.aspx treat this as non-FATAL error? How do I evaluate the context > where errors will be treated as FALAL/Critical ones? > > This is where it becomes necessary to study the Microsoft > documentation. > You may have gotten that error because you were trying to do more than > one thing (lots of the SMB calls do more than one thing). Find out > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2013-May/092475.html which message returned the error, and then look at the documentation > for that call (both in section 2 and section 3). Start with [MS-CIFS] > and/or [MS-SMB] if you are working with SMBv1. SMBv2 and V3 are > documented in [MS-SMB2]. Thanks Chris. I looked into the MS-CIFS documentation. In my case the STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST error is generated for NT-TRANS request with IOCTL subcommand. But in MS-CIFS documentation, the error codes list for NT-TRANS command with IOCTL subcommand doesn't show the STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST error. What's wrong? Please refer the attached pcap file with 2 SMB packets. The IOCTL is being performed on some file system resource. And the IOCTL parameters show 'Unknown' function. Could this be the reason of error? Could this happen because of incompatibility of Windows versions? > > Chris -)----- [...] -- Thanks, Nilesh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smb_packets.pcap Type: application/octet-stream Size: 301 bytes Desc: smb_packets.pcap URL:
Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you http://serverfault.com/questions/367078/windows-8-and-smb2-issues might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Server Fault Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered Ask Question _ Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. Join them; error codes it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Windows 8 and SMB2 Issues up vote 4 down vote favorite We're playing with the consumer preview of Windows 8 and having issues accessing some nt ioctl error network shares in our environment. Basically, when I attempt to access a share directly (\[SERVER].[DOMAIN].[NETWORK]\Share$) I get 'An extended error has occured'. The shares reside on an EMC Celerra system. Sorry, I don't really have much more information about it (this is just a little side project). Accessing shares that reside on Windows machines are fine. The Firewall is completley disabled and I am running under full domain administrative credentials. A quick wireshark shows the following group of packets between myself and the server: SMB2 164 NegotiateProtocol Request SMB2 274 NegotiateProtocol Response SMB2 981 SessionSetup Request SMB2 281 SessionSetup Response SMB2 200 TreeConnect Request Tree: \\[SERVER].[DOMAIN].[NETWORK]\[SHARE]$ SMB2 138 TreeConnect Response SMB2 202 Ioctl Request NETWORK_FILE_SYSTEM Function:0x0080 SMB2 131 Ioctl Response, Error: STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST SMB2 126 SessionLogoff Request SMB2 126 SessionLogoff Respons This repeats five times and then (I assume) Windows throws me the above error. A quick Google shows me: 0xC0000010 STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST The specified request is not a valid operation for the target device. Which sho