Error 19019
Contents |
(Русский)ישראל (עברית)المملكة العربية السعودية (العربية)ไทย (ไทย)대한민국 (한국어)中华人民共和国 (中文)台灣 (中文)日本 (日本語) HomeLibraryLearnDownloadsTroubleshootingCommunityForums Ask a question Quick access Forums home Browse forums users FAQ Search related threads Remove From My Forums Asked by: Event ID: 19019 Evevt Category: (3) SQL Server > SQL Server High Availability event id 19019 the mssqlserver service terminated unexpectedly and Disaster Recovery Question 0 Sign in to vote I have a 2
Event Id 19019 Sql Server 2008 R2
node SQL Server (SQLCLUSTERTEST 1 and SQLCLUSTERTEST2)Test Cluster. I tried to move Test1 to Test2, I could not start [sqsrvres] checkqueryprocessoralive: sqlexecdirect failed the SQL Services on SQLCLUSTERTEST 1, I received the following error message: Event Type: Error Event Source: MSSQL$sqlclustertest1 Event Category: (3) Event ID: 19019 Date: 5/4/2010 Time: 3:50:28 PM User: N/A Computer:
Sqsrvres Odbc Sqldriverconnect Failed Sql 2008
SQLCLUSTERTEST2 Description: [sqsrvres] OnlineThread: ResUtilSetResourceServiceEnvironment failed (status 6) . Data: 0000: 4b 4a 00 40 01 00 00 00 KJ.@.... 0008: 10 00 00 00 73 00 71 00 ....s.q. 0010: 6c 00 76 00 73 00 65 00 l.v.s.e. 0018: 72 00 76 00 65 00 72 00 r.v.e.r. 0020: 74 00 65 00 73 00 74 00 t.e.s.t. 0028: 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1....... Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:27 PM Reply | Quote All replies 0 Sign in to vote Check if the account on which SQL Server Instance SQLCLUSTERTEST 1 run have "Local Administrator" privileges on SQLCLUSTERTEST2. Please provide the SQL Server & Windows Version build details.Sivaprasad S http://sivasql.blogspot.com Please click the Mark as Answer button if a post solves your problem! Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:29 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Am I correct to assume that you built the Windows cluster with a single node, installed SQL Server failover cluster, and then added the second node?bass_player http://bassplayerdoc.blogspot.com/ Wednesday, May 05, 2010 12:38 AM Reply | Quote Moderator 0 Sign in to vote Yes, both have local admin priveleges Both nodes have SQL Server 2005 Enterprise x64. Wednesday, May 05, 2010 1:06 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote I started off with 2 WindowsClusters; SQLCLUSTERTEST1 (test1) and SQLCLUSTERTEST2 (test2). Test1 has a R and a S drive. Test2 has the T and U drive. I installed SQLSERVER 2005 Enterprise x64 on Test1 (SQLvSrvr1)first. I then installed the SQL
2008 to R2 tonight. We upgraded the inactive node to R2 SP2 and then went to failover the cluster so we could upgrade the other node. But when we tried to failover it failed. The only thing the critical events for the resource said was that it couldn't failover. So no help there. The only other error was in the event viewer and it said that the shared component upgrade failed… even though nothing in the upgrade process failed. There actually were other errors in the event viewer but I'll let the link below cover those. The big important error was Error: 19019. I remembered something from a few yrs ago that involved a registry https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/43be5fb4-5ff6-4813-8214-b26521c74ff4/event-id-19019-evevt-category-3?forum=sqldisasterrecovery fix so I started looking at the registry. After opening regedit I went to the most logical place: HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10_50.SQL2008 Once there I saw the Setup folder, which seemed like a good place to start. Inside there I saw a key called SQLDataRoot and its value started with E:\ Well, I have a pretty standardized environment so I know the SQL root was supposed to be on D:. I changed the location to D:\ and the SQL Server resource http://www.midnightdba.com/DBARant/cluster-upgrade-error-19019/ came online instantly. So again, that registry key is: HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10_50.SQL2008\Setup\SQLDataRoot This is not only an interesting fix, it’s also a testament to what having a highly standardized environment can do for you. I could have compared this entry with node1 to see if they matched, but it may not have even been flagged as an issue if we didn't always install SQL on D:\. So once I had the fix in place, I had something to search for, so I went to google to see if I could find anything about it out there. I came across this great blog post that even gives more detail on this error, so rather than try to reproduce the entire thing here, I’ll just point you to that post. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jorgepc/archive/2010/10/14/onlinethread-sql-cluster-shared-data-upgrade-failed-error-installing-cumulative-update-in-sql-server.aspx So this is why I call myself the bumbling DBA. I don't actually know anything, but I manage to find my way through solutions somehow. And I know I'll get lots of comments on this with everyone telling me they knew this cause they've seen it 100x and all I can say is bully for you. I've only seen it once and it was a few yrs ago. I don't get out much. DBAtroubleshooting Post navigation Previous PostSQL PASS Summit Day 2 KeynoteNext Post#CISPA's Coming Back: Time to Pay Attention Again Leave a Reply Cancel reply Get
of one computer, and you use it to duplicate to another, you know the other machine is going to be good. You get to apply all your corporate policies, security software, http://jon.netdork.net/2010/09/18/sql-cluster-failure-and-name-changes anti-virus, group policies, etc etc, all in one single step. With this in mind, this is what we did with some SQL clusters we built 6 months ago. The cloning went well, and the servers https://blogs.infosupport.com/the-sql-server-failover-cluster-instance-yourinstance%E2%80%B2-was-not-correctly-detected-the-instance-was-discovered-on-the-local-node-but-it-was-not-found-to-be-active/ were successfully built, SQL deployed, and clusters setup. All was good… Until recently. At first, I didn’t notice a problem, then we had a hiccup with something, I connected to the server using Remote Desktop event id Protocol (RDP), and started poking around, and found nothing unusual. A little baffled, I poked around some more, and some things didn’t seem right to me. Then it dawned on me, I was looking at the wrong server. Disconnecting, I tried again, and ended up back on the same box. For some reason, DNS was pointing to the wrong server. Quickly dropping the DNS record, and adding the other server back, event id 19019 all was good. A few days later, the DNS issue popped up again, doing some more poking around, I discovered that the host name on the server had stayed the same as the cloned machine. For some reason, the sysprep hadn’t properly changed the name. We decided to schedule some time to change the name at a later point in time, but for now, both boxes were stable. A few days ago, the second box, with the incorrect name crashed out, no apparent reason, the cluster service just reported issues, with no specific reason. As the services had started up on the other node correctly, we left it for the night, and decided to deal with it in the morning. Whilst poking around on it the following morning, and trying to fail the SQL services over, we were bombarded by errors in the event log… 3 of them in blocks, for every second it attempted to move over the services. Log Name: Application Source: MSSQLSERVER Date: 9/16/2010 9:04:46 AM Event ID: 19019 Task Category: Failover Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: Server.domain Description: [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed Log Name: Application Source: MSSQLSERVER Date: 9/16/2010 9:04:46 AM Event ID: 19019 Task Category: Failover Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Compute
Authors Contact information Events Media The SQL Server failover cluster instance ‘[yourinstance]′ was not correctly detected. The instance was discovered on the local node but it was not found to be active. Posted on 29 January 2012 by Mark Wolzak Recently when upgrading several of our SQL Server 2008 R2 Clusters to SQL Server 2008 R2 SP1 (KB2528583) clusters I ran into a problem where the update failed, and kept failing. When searching in the logfiles located in: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\Setup bootstrap\Log\Summary.txt We found several of the following errors: Instance [MyInstance] overall summary: Final result: The patch installer has failed to update the shared features. To determine the reason for failure, review the log files. Exit code (Decimal): -2068578304 Exit facility code: 1204 Exit error code: 0 Exit message: The SQL Server failover cluster instance ‘[MyInstance]' was not correctly detected. The instance was discovered on the local node but it was not found to be active. To continue, confirm the state of the instance installed on all applicable nodes of the cluster and the state of the failover cluster resources. Start time: 2011-12-18 01:24:11 End time: 2011-12-18 01:24:45 Requested action: Patch When searching for this error on google I found some tips for troubleshooting this error on this link. The tips basically stated the following cause and resolution: Cause This error generally occurs during Upgrade, repair and rebuild database phases and because of internal /ISLOCALNODEACTIVE setting Resolution The error occurs when the local node is not the owner of the cluster group, but Setup was unable to detect any other nodes in the cluster Verify that the registry of the remote machines is accessible to the local node The list of nodes is automatically calculated Verify that the instance name specified by the user is installed on some nodes of the cluster In my case the resolution proved to be more simple than the above suggestions. Apparently something was wrong with the update supplied from Windows Update. Instead of using the update from windows update through our WSUS-server, I downloaded the update separately at microsoft.com, here. Updating with this update did the trick. Everything went smooth from here. I can recommend updating the inactive node, and when updating is complete move the instances to the updated node and continue the update on the next node. Don't be alarmed if the instance cannot be accessed instantly when failing over to the updated node. When instances beco