Fatal Error Bind Failed In Find_raw_ifaces4
[Fedora]Fedora Reporter: JW Component: openswanAssignee: Paul Wouters Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Priority: unspecified Version: 21CC: ohtmvyyn, pwouters Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Reopened Target Release: --- Hardware: Unspecified OS: Unspecified Whiteboard: Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix Doc Text: Story Points: --- Clone Of: Environment: Last Closed: 2015-12-01 21:59:01 EST Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- CRM: Verified Versions: Category: --- oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: Cloudforms Team: --- Description JW 2013-09-27 20:25:30 EDT Description of problem: pluto binds to ALL interfaces despite --interface option use Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openswan-2.6.38 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. only multi-interface host add 'plutoopts="--interface eth0"' to /etc/ipsec.conf 2. on another interface, eg eth1, run something with bind to isakmp port (eg vpnc) 3. start ipsec Actual results: 3. ipsec fails with "ipsec__plutorun: 003 FATAL ERROR: bind() failed in find_raw_ifaces4(). Errno 98: Address already in use" Expected results: 3. ipsec/pluto should run since is supposed to be binding to a single interface only Additional info: In sysdep_linux:find_raw_ifaces4() there is a pointless and wrong bind to isakmp port on ALL interfaces. The bind is pointless because it isn't necessary to bind a socket if one isn't going to send anything via it (only SIOCGIFCONF and SIOCGIFFLAGS ioctls are being done). And it is wrong because it totally ignores the command to only bind to explicitly specified interfaces with the pluto "--interface" command-line option. Comment 1 JW 2013-09-27 20:26:22 EDT Correction: "1. on multi-interface ..." Comment 2 Paul Wouters 2013-09-30 10:07:56 EDT the interfaces= is really an option left from the KLIPS days where everything is routing based, and does not really apply to XFRM/NETKEY. The man page isn't entirely too clear about it but does mention it: interfaces virtual and physical interfaces for IPsec to use: a single virtual=physical pair, a (quoted!) list of pairs separated by white space, or %none. One of the pairs may be written as %defaultroute, which means: find the interface d that the default route points to, and then act as if the value was ``ipsec0=d''. %defaultroute is the default; %none must be used to denote no interfaces, or when using the NETKEY stack. If %defaultroute is used (implicitly or explicitly) information about the default route and its interface is noted for use by
20 Jul 2009 19:03:02 UTC Severity: normal Found in version openswan/1:2.6.21+dfsg-2 Fixed in version openswan/1:2.6.26+dfsg-1 Done: Harald Jenny Bug is archived. No further changes may be made. Toggle useless messagesView this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Rene Mayrhofer : Bug#537762; Package openswan. (Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:03:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Acknowledgement sent to Paul Evans : New Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multiple&id=1013175 report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Rene Mayrhofer . (Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:03:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available. Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply): From: Paul Evans To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: openswan: pluto fails to start without manual "modprobe https://bugs.debian.org/537762 ip_gre" Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:00:21 +0100 Package: openswan Version: 1:2.6.21+dfsg-2 Severity: normal After a clean install of openswan, it fails to start; throwing this into syslog every 10 seconds or so: Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec_setup: Restarting Openswan IPsec U2.6.21/K2.6.26-2-amd64... Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec_setup: Using NETKEY(XFRM) stack Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle kernel: [6914004.525186] Initializing XFRM netlink socket Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec_setup: ...Openswan IPsec started Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle pluto: adjusting ipsec.d to /etc/ipsec.d Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec__plutorun: adjusting ipsec.d to /etc/ipsec.d Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle last message repeated 2 times Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec__plutorun: 003 FATAL ERROR: bind() failed in find_raw_ifaces4(). Errno 98: Address already in use Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec__plutorun: !pluto failure!: exited with error status 1 Jul 20 19:29:19 nacelle ipsec__plutorun: restarting IPsec after pause... Jul 20 19:29:29 nacelle ipsec_setup: S
проблема при запуске сервера Страницы 1 #1 2007-04-18 11:27:23 ff Участник Из почти Donetsk Зарегистрирован: 2007-04-17 Сообщений: 107 OPENSWAN проблема https://redhat-club.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=2993 при запуске сервера Доброго времени суток уважаемые.Подскажите пожалуйста в чем может быть проблема:пытаюсь настроить ipsec тунель между двумя сетями.на шлюзе одной установил http://stackoverflow.com/questions/27398461/ibm-worklight-server-not-working-after-update-6-3 пакет openswan сделал настройки сети но без запуска, просто добавляю и все.на шлюзе второй сети так же установил пакет. при попытке fatal error поднять сервер в mеssages на блюдаю следующееApr 16 19:28:29 ipsec: Restarting Openswan IPsec U2.4.4/K2.6.9-1.667asp... Apr 16 19:28:29 ipsec: insmod /lib/modules/2.6.9-1.667asp/kernel/net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.ko Apr 16 19:28:29 ipsec_setup: KLIPS ipsec0 on eth1 195.x.x.x/255.255.255.x broadcast 195.x.x.xx Apr 16 19:28:29 racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER Apr 16 fatal error bind 19:28:29 last message repeated 2 times Apr 16 19:28:29 ipsec_setup: ...Openswan IPsec started Apr 16 19:28:29 setup: гЮОСЯЙЮЕРЯЪ IPsec: succeeded Apr 16 19:28:29 ipsec__plutorun: 003 FATAL ERROR: bind() failed in find_raw_ifaces4(). Errno 98: Address already in use Apr 16 19:28:29 ipsec__plutorun: !pluto failure!: exited with error status 1 Apr 16 19:28:29 ipsec__plutorun: restarting IPsec after pause... Apr 16 19:28:37 ipsec: Stopping Openswan IPsec... Apr 16 19:28:37 rmmod: ERROR: Module af_key is in useВ чем проблема? Может каких модулей не хватает?ASPL10 Offline #2 2007-04-18 15:21:45 alu Участник Из Саратов Зарегистрирован: 2006-09-03 Сообщений: 426 Re: OPENSWAN проблема при запуске сервера у тебя случайно 50 51 протоколы не фильтруются фаерволом? и порты 500 udpпокажи секциюconfig setupчто у тебя в interfaces= '???' Offline #3 2007-04-18 16:05:49 ff Участник Из по
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up IBM Worklight server not working after update 6.3 up vote 1 down vote favorite IBM Worklight server not working after update 6.3. The error states Server MobileFirst Development Server failed to start. Any thoughts about this error? Added a image for reference. On console, i am getting the error FATAL ERROR in native method: JDWP No transports initialized, jvmtiError=AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197) ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use ERROR: JDWP Transport dt_socket failed to initialize, TRANSPORT_INIT(510) JDWP exit error AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197): No transports initialized [../../../src/share/back/debugInit.c:750] ibm-mobilefirst worklight-server share|improve this question edited Dec 10 '14 at 10:41 asked Dec 10 '14 at 10:19 user2968709 436 Do you see any helpful messages in the Console view in Eclipse? –Andrew Ferrier Dec 10 '14 at 10:38 On console, i am getting the error FATAL ERROR in native method: JDWP No transports initialized, jvmtiError=AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197) ERROR: transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use ERROR: JDWP Transport dt_socket failed to initialize, TRANSPORT_INIT(510) JDWP exit error AGENT_ERROR_TRANSPORT_INIT(197): No transports initialized [../../../src/share/back/debugInit.c:750] –user2968709 Dec 10 '14 at 10:45 Agreed with djna's answer. Try to locate and kill your existing server. –Andrew Ferrier Dec 10 '14 at 14:37 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 2 down vote accepted Transport already in use: could you have an old copy of the server still running. Unless I can spot the process and kill it I'd restart my machine. share|improve this answer