Fundamental Attribution Error Studies
Contents |
messages) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting fundamental attribution error examples only of original research should be removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and fundamental attribution error definition when to remove this template message) This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please fundamental attribution error quizlet improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In ultimate attribution error social psychology, the fundamental attribution error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics of the agent (character or intention), rather than external factors, in explaining another person's behavior in a given situation. This contrasts with interpreting one's own behavior, where situational factors
Defensive Attribution
are more easily recognized and can be taken into account. Contents 1 Examples 2 Details 3 Classic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967) 4 Explanations 5 Cultural differences in the error 6 Versus correspondence bias 7 See also 7.1 Cognitive biases 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Examples[edit] As a simple example, consider a situation where Alice, a driver, is about to pass through an intersection. Her light turns green and she begins to accelerate, but another car drives through the red light and crosses in front of her. The fundamental attribution error may lead her to think that the driver of the other car was an unskilled or reckless driver. This will be an error if the other driver had a good reason for running the light, such as rushing a patient to the hospital. If this is the case and Alice had been driving the other car, she would have understood that the situation called for speed at the cost of safety, but when seeing it fr
Login Help Contact Us About Access You are not currently logged in. Access your personal account or get JSTOR
Self Serving Bias
access through your library or other institution: login Log in to your actor observer bias personal account or through your institution. Psychological Inquiry Vol. 12, No. 1, 2001 The Really Fundament... The gilbert and malone 1995 Really Fundamental Attribution Error in Social Psychological Research John Sabini, Michael Siepmann and Julia Stein Psychological Inquiry Vol. 12, No. 1 (2001), pp. 1-15 Published by: Taylor & Francis, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449294 Page Count: 15 Download ($45.00) Cite this Item Cite This Item Copy Citation Export Citation Export to RefWorks Export a RIS file (For EndNote, ProCite, Reference Manager, Zotero…) Export a Text file (For BibTex) Note: Always review your references and make any necessary corrections before using. Pay attention to names, capitalization, and dates. × http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449294 Close Overlay Journal Info Psychological Inquiry Description: Psychological Inquiry is an international forum for the discussion of theory and meta-theory. The journal strives to publish articles that represent broad, provocative, and debatable theoretical ideas primarily in the areas of social psychology and personality. We discourage submission of purely empirical, applied, or review articles. Each issue typically includes a target article followed by peer commentaries and a response from the target author. Manuscripts for the target articles can be invited or submitted. Manuscripts for the commentaries are always invited. Authors for the commentaries are chosen by the editors with input from the target authors. Coverage: 1990-2008 (Vol. 1, No. 1 - Vol. 19, No. 3/4) Moving Wall Moving Wall: 7 years (What is the moving wall?) Moving Wall The "moving wall" represents the time period between the last issue available in JSTOR and the most recently published issue of a journal. Moving walls are generally represented in years. In rare instances, a publisher has elected to have a "zero" moving wall, so their current
overestimate the impact of dispositional factors. For instance, people often tend to believe that aggressive behavior is caused by aggressive personality characteristics (dispositional factor) even though aggressive behavior can also http://psychology.iresearchnet.com/social-psychology/social-cognition/fundamental-attribution-error/ be provoked by situational circumstances (situational factor). History of Fundamental Attribution Error The term fundamental attribution error was created in 1977 by social psychologist Lee Ross. However, research on the fundamental attribution error goes back to the 1950s when social psychologists Fritz Heider and Gustav Ichheiser started to investigate lay perceivers' understanding of the causes attribution error of human behavior. Interest in the fundamental attribution error experienced a peak in the 1970s and 1980s when a general notion within social psychology was to discover shortcomings in human judgment. Notwithstanding its widely accepted significance for social psychology, the fundamental attribution error has also been the subject of controversies regarding its general nature. On the fundamental attribution error one hand, critics argued that the fundamental attribution error does not occur for everyone under any circumstances, which challenges the adequacy of the label fundamental. On the other hand, critics claimed that there is no unambiguous criterion that could specify the real causes of human behavior, thus challenging the adequacy of the term error. Irrespective of these controversies, the fundamental attribution error is generally regarded as a very important phenomenon for social psychology, as it often leads to surprised reactions to research findings demonstrating a strong impact of situational factors on human behavior. Fundamental Attribution Error Evidence From a general perspective, evidence for the fundamental attribution error comes from three different lines of research. First, numerous studies have shown that people tend to infer stable personality characteristics from observed behavior even when this behavior could also be due to situational factors. For example, students may infer a high level of dispositional anxiety from a fellow student's nervous behavior during a class presentation, even though such n