Psychology Attribution Error
Contents |
messages) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2015) (Learn how
Fundamental Attribution Error Examples
and when to remove this template message) This article relies too much on fundamental attribution error definition psychology references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove
Fundamental Attribution Error Quizlet
this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In social psychology, the fundamental attribution error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to defensive attribution place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics of the agent (character or intention), rather than external factors, in explaining another person's behavior in a given situation. This contrasts with interpreting one's own behavior, where situational factors are more easily recognized and can be taken into account. Contents 1 Examples 2 Details 3 Classic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967) 4 Explanations 5 Cultural differences in the error 6 ultimate attribution error Versus correspondence bias 7 See also 7.1 Cognitive biases 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Examples[edit] As a simple example, consider a situation where Alice, a driver, is about to pass through an intersection. Her light turns green and she begins to accelerate, but another car drives through the red light and crosses in front of her. The fundamental attribution error may lead her to think that the driver of the other car was an unskilled or reckless driver. This will be an error if the other driver had a good reason for running the light, such as rushing a patient to the hospital. If this is the case and Alice had been driving the other car, she would have understood that the situation called for speed at the cost of safety, but when seeing it from the outside she was inclined to believe that the behavior of the other driver reflected their fundamental nature (having poor driving skills or a reckless attitude). Another example relates to a slippery path: A traveler carefully walks down a sloped path in the rain. The traveler slips and falls. The traveler believes this is a slippery path. The traveler continues more carefully.
News Word of the Day Psychology Journals Psych Writing GRE Psychology Articles Psych Links Get Into Grad School Advertise Support
The Fundamental Attribution Error Refers To The Tendency Of
Psychology Glossary A B C D E F G H I the fundamental attribution error is less likely J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Follow
Fundamental Attribution Theory Definition
AlleyDog Fundamental Attribution Error Imagine this situation, you are at school and someone you know comes by, you say hello, and this person just gives you a quick, unfriendly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error "hello" and then walks away. How would you attribute this situation -- why did this person act this way? If you react to this situation by saying the person is a "jerk" or an "ass", then you have made the fundamental attribution error; the tendency for an observer, when interpreting and explaining the behavior of another person (the http://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Fundamental%20Attribution%20Error actor), to underestimate the situation and to overestimate the personal disposition. Maybe the person was having the worst day of their life, just found out a loved one died, failed a test and was feeling devastated, etc. In this case, the situation may have caused them to act in a way that was different than their normal happy self. But, you, as a normal observer, would instead attribute their behavior to them as a person...acted that way because that is the type of person they are. Add flashcard Cite Random Interested in a Graduate Psychology Degree? You can get free information about Adler University's graduate psychology programs just by answering a few short questions. Get Free Info Word of the Day Get the word of the day delivered to your inbox Want to study Fundamental Attribution Error? Check out Adler University © 1998-2016, AlleyDog.com. All material within this site is the property of AlleyDog.com. This material may not be reprinted or copied for any reason without the express written consent of AlleyDog.com.
all › No Fear Literature Page-by-page Translations Beowulf The Canterbury Tales Heart of Darkness See all › Shakespearearrow No Fear Shakespeare Line-by-line Translations Macbeth Hamlet Romeo and http://www.sparknotes.com/psychology/psych101/socialpsychology/section3.rhtml Juliet Othello A Midsummer Night’s Dream Julius Caesar See all › Shakespeare Study http://brainstormpsychology.blogspot.com/2013/09/fundamental-attribution-error_6.html Guides Macbeth Hamlet Romeo and Juliet Othello As You Like It Coriolanus Cymbeline Henry IV, Part 1 Henry V Henry VIII Henry IV See all › Shakespeare Videos (8:24) Hamlet (9:12) Othello (9:18) Romeo and Juliet (9:01) Julius Caesar See all › Video SparkLife SparkTests Morearrow Other Subjects Biology Biography Chemistry attribution error Computer Science Drama Economics Film History Literature Math Philosophy Physics Poetry Psychology Sociology U.S. Government Test Prep Home → SparkNotes → Psychology Study Guides → Social Psychology → Attribution Contents Introduction Summary & AnalysisImpressionsStereotypes and PrejudiceAttributionAttitudesSocial InfluenceAttractionObedience and AuthorityGroupsHelping BehaviorQuick Review Review Questions Social Psychology Quiz How to Cite This SparkNote Social Psychology ←Attribution→Stereotypes and PrejudiceAttribution, page 2 page 1 of 3 Attributions are fundamental attribution error inferences that people make about the causes of events and behavior. People make attributions in order to understand their experiences. Attributions strongly influence the way people interact with others. Types of Attributions Researchers classify attributions along two dimensions: internal vs. external and stable vs. unstable. By combining these two dimensions of attributes, researchers can classify a particular attribution as being internal-stable, internal-unstable, external-stable, or external-unstable. Internal vs. External Attribution theory proposes that the attributions people make about events and behavior can be classed as either internal or external. In an internal, or dispositional, attribution, people infer that an event or a person’s behavior is due to personal factors such as traits, abilities, or feelings. In an external, or situational, attribution, people infer that a person’s behavior is due to situational factors. Example: Maria’s car breaks down on the freeway. If she believes the breakdown happened because of her ignorance about cars, she is making an internal attribution. If she believes that the breakdown happened because her car is old, she is making an external attribution. Stable vs. Unstable Researchers also distinguish between stable and unstable attributions. When people make a s
of blame on a persons personality or characteristics rather than situational factors is quite a common one. This is because we tend to focus more on the person involved by assuming that a person is responsible due to their personality/characteristics and not the conditions around them that they could not have had control over in the first place. This phenomena is what you call the fundamental attribution error. An example of fundamental attribution error is when you see someone driving and swerving and crashing into a tree, automatically you would think ''what is this person doing?!'' or ''this person is actually crazy?!'' but the real reason for the accident was not because of the person directly but because a pedestrian ran into the road and so to avoid hitting the pedestrian the driver hit the brakes whilst steering round them where their tyres slipped over a wet patch on the road causing the crash. As an observer watching the whole thing take place you would most likely blame the person driving for being reckless if you had not have known what contributed to the crash. The truth is that these multiple factors such as the surprise pedestrian, the wet patch in the road, etc, would have caused the crash regardless of who was behind the wheel, so it wouldn't have just taken a reckless personality to crash the car in this scenario. A second example of the fundamental attribution error is when you ask a stranger for directions but they give you a seemingly snarky response or they're simply rude to you. Naturally you would peg this person as rude and having a bad personality, but looking past their initial first impression they may have had a bad day putting them in a foul mood or they've just received some devastatingly bad news and you were the first person they have come into contact with since receiving this news. They acted the way they did not because of their natural personality (most people ar