Asp Stack Overflow Error
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow stack overflow error c++ the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow fix stack overflow error Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 stack overflow error windows xp million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Stack overflow error in C# set/get up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 I was working on a public
Stack Overflow Error Windows 7
comments part of an application on Friday when I got a stack overflow error, which confused me so I thought I'd ask for help. And searching the web using the expression 'stack overflow' is a bit self-defeating! I wanted to do an HtmlEncode on the set statement of the field in the class, before sending an instance of the class to be added to the database: public class Feedback { public Feedback() stack overflow javascript error { } public string FeedbackComment { get { return FeedbackComment; } set {System.Web.HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(value); } } // other fields // methods } This was causing StackOverflow errors, I've fixed the error by changing the code to look like this: public class Feedback { public Feedback() { } private string feedbackComment; public string FeedbackComment { get { return feedbackComment; } set { feedbackComment = System.Web.HttpUtility.HtmlEncode(value); } } // other fields // methods } But I just wanted an explanation of why the first get/set statements were so recursive that they caused a stack overflow but when reverting the code to look more like c#2.0 worked? Can this be achieved with the shorter syntax and if so how? This is my first question on SO - please try to be gentle! c# asp.net exception share|improve this question edited Mar 29 '10 at 11:49 Marc Gravell♦ 627k14417512223 asked Mar 7 '10 at 22:19 amelvin 7,16132351 5 I cannot help but think that this site is the perfect place for this question –jakebman Mar 7 '10 at 22:27 So many correct answers - thanks for all the help. –amelvin Mar 8 '10 at 9:53 add a comment| 8 Answers 8 active oldest votes up vote 21 down vote accepted The getter of the first example is returning
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring stack overflow line error developers or posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question
Stack Overflow Line 0 Error
x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow Community Stack Overflow is a community of 4.7 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them;
Stack Overflow Error Java
it only takes a minute: Sign up C# catch a stack overflow exception up vote 74 down vote favorite 13 I got a recursive call to a methode that throw a stack overflow exception. The first call is surrounded http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2398219/stack-overflow-error-in-c-sharp-set-get by a try catch block but the exception is not caught. Do the stack overflow exception behave in a special way ? Can I catch/handle properly the exception ? NB : if relevant : the exception is not thrown in the main thread the object where the code is throwing the exception is manually loaded by Assembly.LoadFrom(...).CreateInstance(...) c# try-catch stack-overflow share|improve this question edited Feb 22 '10 at 5:46 Ether 39.7k1065140 asked Oct 21 '09 at 7:15 Toto 3,552103760 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1599219/c-sharp-catch-a-stack-overflow-exception 2 @RichardOD, sure I fix the bug because it was a bug. However the issue can appear in a different way and I wan to handle it –Toto Oct 21 '09 at 7:24 7 Agreed, a stack overflow is a serious error that can't be caught because it shouldn't be caught. Fix the broken code instead. –Ian Kemp Oct 21 '09 at 7:26 9 @RichardOD: If one wants to design e.g. a recursive-descent parser and not impose artificial limits on depth beyond those actually required by the host machine, how should one go about it? If I had my druthers, there would be a StackCritical exception which could be explicitly caught, which would be fired while there was still a little stack space left; it would disable itself until it was actually thrown, and could then not be caught until a safe amount of stack space remained. –supercat Dec 17 '10 at 18:54 This question is useful -- I want to fail a unit test if a stack overflow exception occurs -- but NUnit just moves the test to the "ignored" category instead of failing it like it would with other exceptions -- I need to catch it and do an Assert.Fail instead. So seriously -- how do we go about this? –BrainSlugs83 Sep 7 '14 at 20:04 add a comment| 9 Answers 9 active oldest votes up vote 78 do