Parameter Out Of Range Error Yamaha
Contents |
are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More. Mixers/Consoles LS9-32 and Yamaha Studio Manager Issues Discussion in 'Sound, Music, and Intercom' started by unity argumentoutofrangeexception argument is out of range. parameter name index Dejoux, Dec 6, 2011. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > Dejoux
Argumentoutofrangeexception Argument Is Out Of Range Unity
New Member Messages: 26 Likes Received: 0 Location: Syracuse, NY Hi, im a high school senior and Ive been having parameter name index c# trouble with getting my crew's LS9-32 and Yamaha Studio Manager to agree with each other. ive got the ls9 set up with a wireless router so i can control it with a
Argumentoutofrangeexception Argument Is Out Of Range C#
laptop from various places. Before i get into this, i have read the entire "Problems with Yamaha Studio Manager for LS9-32" thread several times and it has helped some but not enough. so if anyone has any additional information, it'd be greatly appreciated. Ive had this setup working for at least 2 years now, but every now and then (especially when we break down, clean out system.argumentoutofrangeexception: argument is out of range. and set back up), the console and the software have a disagreement. this time, Ive gone through pretty much all of the steps, but im not getting to where i need to be. Ive re downloaded the network driver several times, matched the IP, subnet, mac address and Midi port. Ive pinged the console with command prompt and Ive gotten all 4 pings back, 0% loss. ive gone through all the setups with Studio manager, remapping midi ports, modified workspace, adjusted midi settings and all that jazz. when i launch the ls9 software, i go through and i setup the input/output ports to the ls9. the problem is when i go to sync. i sync from console>pc and i get to about 30% and i get: "Failure [Parameter out of range error (-1)][26 sec]" i can control the board and make changes in real time, but when it gets to the scene load portion of the sync, it stops. so everything looks like the default and not how it would appear if it had synced properly. the past few days have been very frustrating, downloading new drivers, firmwares, software, scouring forums and countless hours of
and Software >CL Series CL5 Firmware V4.04 Important Notice Important notices We found a bug with V4.00 and V4.01, that could occur when connecting Shure ULXD receivers, and could change the GROUP/CH indication to unassigned
Argument Out Of Range C#
on the receiver LCD and disconnect the wireless device if operated over the
Argument Out Of Range Delphi
P51 band (used in Germany and China only). We already fixed it with firmware V4.02 and advise you to unity argument is out of range index update the firmware especially if using Shure ULXD over the P51 band. In addition, we found a bug with EQ-1A in Premium Rack on firmware V4.02 and older, that might rarely cause https://www.controlbooth.com/threads/ls9-32-and-yamaha-studio-manager-issues.26754/ a noise when operating the LO BOOST parameter, and a mute under certain conditions. We fixed it with V4.04, and highly recommend you to update the firmware from V4.02 or older. Use this file to update CL5/3/1 to V4.04. Please read the following instructions before updating. Caution when updating Use the "cl*_firm404.zip" (* is the model number) when updating. Copy files "CL_SUBP_V404.BIN" and "MCLP4_04.PGM" to http://www.yamahaproaudio.com/global/en/downloads/firmware_software/cl/cl5_firm_latest.jsp the root directory of the USB memory. Follow the instructions on the update guide. If updating from CL V3.11 or older, you also need to update the Dante firmware. You can now update the Dante firmware for CL also by using the USB memory. This method allows you to update both the firmware and the "CL_SUBP_V404.BIN" and "MCLP4_04.PGM" files together at the same time. If updating from CL V1.61 or older, or if the message "NAME SUB CPU is old" appears after updating to V4.04, copy "CL-MD101.BIN" file in CL*_firm404/NAME SUB (* is the model number) to the root directory of the USB memory. Follow the instructions on the update guide. This method allows you to update both the Dante firmware and the "CL_SUBP_V404.BIN" and "MCLP4_04.PGM" files together at the same time. *IMPORTANT NOTE* Before copying files, delete all files with extension .PGM and .BIN if any exists in the root directory of the USB memory. Prior to V3.0, the CL and QL Series used different files when updating, but both files used the same name * "C-MD1.BIN." For this reason, an error may occur during update when the incorrect "C
Support Answers MathWorks Search MathWorks.com MathWorks Answers Support MATLAB Answers™ MATLAB Central Community Home MATLAB Answers File Exchange Cody Blogs Newsreader Link Exchange ThingSpeak Anniversary Home Ask Answer Browse https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/101027-why-do-i-receive-a-parameter-out-of-range-error-when-i-run-my-model-that-contains-a-filter-block-r More Contributors Recent Activity Flagged Content Flagged as Spam Help MATLAB Central Community Home MATLAB Answers File Exchange Cody Blogs Newsreader Link Exchange ThingSpeak Anniversary Home Ask Answer Browse More Contributors Recent Activity Flagged Content Flagged as Spam Help Trial software MathWorks Support Team (view profile) 13,648 questions 13,649 answers 13,647 accepted answers Reputation: 2,641 Vote0 Why do I receive a "parameter out of out of range" error when I run my model that contains a filter block realized by FDATool? Asked by MathWorks Support Team MathWorks Support Team (view profile) 13,648 questions 13,649 answers 13,647 accepted answers Reputation: 2,641 on 27 Jun 2009 Accepted Answer by MathWorks Support Team MathWorks Support Team (view profile) 13,648 questions 13,649 answers 13,647 accepted answers Reputation: 2,641 8 views (last 30 days) 8 out of range views (last 30 days) Why do I receive a "parameter out of range" error when I run my model that contains a Filter block realized by the Filter Design Tool in Filter Design Toolbox 2.2 (R13.0.1)?1. I designed a low pass filter using FDATool2. I enabled quantization for the filter3. I optimized the filter to prevent overlow4. I realized the filter in a Simulink modelWhen I run the model, I get an error message similar to the following, saying it saturated at the second stage of the filter: Parameter is outside the range of the fixed point data type; it has been saturated to its maximum limit in 'xilinx_1st/SMPTE_1.3Mq/s(2)' 0 Comments Show all comments Tags filterdesignfdatoolblocksetdsp Products Filter Design Toolbox Related Content 1 Answer MathWorks Support Team (view profile) 13,648 questions 13,649 answers 13,647 accepted answers Reputation: 2,641 Vote0 Link Direct link to this answer: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/101027#answer_110375 Answer by MathWorks Support Team MathWorks Support Team (view profile) 13,648 questions 13,649 answers 13,647 accepted answers Reputation: 2,641 on 27 Jun 2009 Accepted answer This is a bug in Filter Design Toolbox 2.2 (R13.0.1) in the way that Parameter Scaling Mode is hand
be down. Please try the request again. Your cache administrator is webmaster. Generated Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:27:30 GMT by s_wx1196 (squid/3.5.20)