Pg_atoi Error Reading Numerical Result Out Of Range
Contents |
Samples & SAS Notes Focus Areas SUPPORT License Assistance Manage My Software Account Downloads & Hot Fixes TRAINING & BOOKS Books netezza numeric value out of range Training Certification SAS Global Academic Program SAS OnDemand For Academics
Error: 0 : Numeric Value Out Of Range
USERS GROUPS Advanced Search support.sas.com Knowledge Base Support Training & Books Store Support Communities numeric value out of range sql Knowledge Base Products & Solutions System Requirements Install Center Third-Party Software Reference Documentation Papers Samples & SAS Notes Browse by Topic Search Samples Search Usage Notes numeric value out of range informatica Search Installation Notes Search Problem Notes Focus Areas Problem Note 50236: An "out of range" error occurs when you insert a BIGINT value into a Netezza table When using a DATA Step or SQL procedure to insert a BIGINT value greater than 922337203685477580 into a Netezza table, you might see the following
Sas Cli Cursor Extended Fetch Error Numeric Value Out Of Range
ERROR message written to the SAS log: ERROR: CLI execute error: ERROR: int8 value out of range: "9223372036854775888" The table is created, but when it is accessed, this message is issued: ERROR: Invalid Operation. ERROR: Termination due to Floating Point Exception To work around the error, either do not use values larger than 19 digits, or else you can convert the values to character, as follows: proc sql; create table nz.newtable as select put(t1.i, 20.) as new_i from work.test t1 ; quit; Click the Hot Fix tab in this note to access the hot fix for this issue.Operating System and Release InformationProduct FamilyProductSystemProduct ReleaseSAS ReleaseReportedFixed*ReportedFixed*SAS SystemSAS/ACCESS Interface to Netezza64-bit Enabled AIX9.22_M29.49.2 TS2M39.4 TS1M0* For software releases that are not yet generally available, the Fixed Release is the software release in which the problem is planned to be fixed. this is the Log showing the code that was used to illustrate the behavior reported1
Platform-specific comparison files Since some of the tests inherently produce platform-specific results, we have provided a way to supply platform-specific result comparison files. Frequently, the netezza case when same variation applies to multiple platforms; rather than supplying a separate comparison netezza case statement in where clause file for every platform, there is a mapping file that defines which comparison file to use. So, to
Numeric Value Out Of Range Db2
eliminate bogus test "failures" for a particular platform, you must choose or make a variant result file, and then add a line to the mapping file, which is resultmap. Each http://support.sas.com/kb/50236 line in the mapping file is of the form testname/platformpattern=comparisonfilename The test name is just the name of the particular regression test module. The platform pattern is a pattern in the style of expr(1) (that is, a regular expression with an implicit ^ anchor at the start). It is matched against the platform name as printed by config.guess followed by https://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.1/static/regress-platform.html :gcc or :cc, depending on whether you use the GNU compiler or the system's native compiler (on systems where there is a difference). The comparison file name is the name of the substitute result comparison file. For example: the int2 regression test includes a deliberate entry of a value that is too large to fit in int2. The specific error message that is produced is platform-dependent; our reference platform emits ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Numerical result out of range but a fair number of other Unix platforms emit ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large Therefore, we provide a variant comparison file, int2-too-large.out, that includes this spelling of the error message. To silence the bogus "failure" message on HPPA platforms, resultmap includes int2/hppa=int2-too-large which will trigger on any machine for which config.guess's output begins with "hppa". Other lines in resultmap select the variant comparison file for other platforms where it's appropriate. Prev Home Next Regression Tests Up Release Notes Submit correction If you see anything in the documentation that is not correct, does not match your exp
Numerical result out of range The corversor recognize the 'number' like a integer and not like a numeric type ??? I use Win ODBC-7.2.00.3 and Post-7.2.2 http://osdir.com/ml/db.postgresql.sql/2002-10/msg00171.html Thanks all, Alexandre ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Thread at a glance: Previous Message by Date: Re: replace null with 0 in subselect ? On Wednesday 16 October 2002 12:07, Albrecht Berger wrote: > Hello, > I have a statement like out of this : > > INSERT INTO tab1 (c1, c2, c3) VALUES (1,2, SELECT MAX(pos)+1 FROM tab2); > > This works fine if the subselect returns a value, but if it returns > null there is a problem. In this case a 0 has to be inserted. > Is there any pg function which solves this problem ? > out of range I know that oracle has a function but I didn't find > something similar in pg. A quick and dirty solution (untested): INSERT INTO tab1 (c1, c2, c3) VALUES (1,2, (SELECT CASE WHEN (SELECT MAX(pos)+1 ) IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE (SELECT MAX(pos)+1 ) END) ) Ian Barwick barwick@xxxxxxx ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org Next Message by Date: Re: set difference Tom Lane wrote: > > I would like to make symmetrical(set) difference in a query. > > But the simpliest way I could find is > > > select id from a > > except > > select id from b > > union > > select id from b > > except > > select id from a > > > Is there any better solution for this problem? > > One thing you should definitely do is change "union" to "union all". > "union" implies a pass of duplicate removal, which shouldn't be > necessary here (unless a or b individually contain duplic