Postgres Error Integer Out Of Range
Contents |
here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site About Us postgresql integer max value Learn more about Stack Overflow the company Business Learn more about hiring developers or integer out of range django posting ads with us Stack Overflow Questions Jobs Documentation Tags Users Badges Ask Question x Dismiss Join the Stack Overflow
Redshift Error Code 8001
Community Stack Overflow is a community of 6.2 million programmers, just like you, helping each other. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up postgresql - integer out of range up vote
"error: Value Out Of Range For 4 Bytes"
4 down vote favorite Not the slightest idea why the hell this is happening.. I've set up a table accordingly: CREATE TABLE raw ( id SERIAL, regtime float NOT NULL, time float NOT NULL, source varchar(15), sourceport INTEGER, destination varchar(15), destport INTEGER, blocked boolean ); ... + index and grants I've successfully used this table for a while now, and all of a sudden the following insert doesn't psycopg2.dataerror: integer out of range work any longer.. INSERT INTO raw( time, regtime, blocked, destport, sourceport, source, destination ) VALUES ( 1403184512.2283964, 1403184662.118, False, 2, 3, '192.168.0.1', '192.168.0.2' ); The error is: ERROR: integer out of rage I mean comon... Not even sure where to begin debugging this.. I'm not out of disk-space and the error itself is kinda discreet.. postgresql integer runtime-error share|improve this question edited Jun 19 '14 at 14:46 asked Jun 19 '14 at 13:49 Torxed 9,46854169 2 Show the whole insert command. –Clodoaldo Neto Jun 19 '14 at 14:11 @ClodoaldoNeto that is it.. copy and pasted.. Unix timestamp is 1403184512.2283964 and 1403184662.118 respectively, both are fine and does not affect the result in any way what so ever. Also they are placed at the beginning of both the insert clumn definitions and the value definitions. So the position is not the issue here. –Torxed Jun 19 '14 at 14:32 2 Any chance that your id generator has passed 2^31? –Nick Barnes Jun 19 '14 at 14:47 2 Try select max(id) from raw. You also might try changing the type of ID from SERIAL (4 byte signed integer) to BIGSERIAL (8 byte signed integer). Share and e
buildfarm-members pgsql-cluster-hackers pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers pgsql-translators pgsql-www Regional lists Associations User groups Project lists Inactive lists IRC Local User Groups Featured Users International Sites Propaganda Resources Weekly News Re: pgstatindex
Rails Bigint
still throws ERROR: value "3220078592" is out of range for type integer rails bigint postgres From: Takahiro Itagaki
this section Search text: Skip to main content Get involved http://share.ez.no/forums/developer/postgres-error-integer-out-of-range-on-ezcontentobject_attribute.data_int Events Forums eZ Platform eZ Publish 5 Platform Install https://github.com/pat/thinking-sphinx/issues/610 & configuration Setup & design General Developer Suggestions Extensions Localized forums Translation Feedback & ideas about the eZ Community platforms & tools Discussions Learn eZ Publish Zeta Components Write a tutorial - Win an Award Downloads Downloads Blogs eZ out of Community Project Board eZ Publish Next UI All blogs Projects Members Teams Share.ez.no Community Project Board Diff Squad eZ Community » Forums » Developer » Postgres error "integer out of range"... expandshrink 0 like Like it! Postgres error "integer out of range" on ezcontentobject_attribute.data_int Postgres error "integer out of out of range range" on ezcontentobject_attribute.data_int Thursday 27 March 2014 3:28:02 pm - 2 replies Hiwhen I enter a date greater than January 19, 2038, ez legacy on postgresql produces a db error like: Error: error executing query: UPDATE ezcontentobject_attribute SET language_id=2, contentclassattribute_id=3408, attribute_original_id=0, sort_key_int=2556054000, sort_key_string='', data_type_string='ezdate', data_text='', data_int=2556054000, data_float=0.000000 WHERE id='33806' AND contentobject_id='3050' AND version='5' AND language_code='ita-IT': ERROR: integer out of rangeI have not found similar problems in issue.ez.no... I have to correct the structure of the db? Something like: ALTER TABLE ezcontentobject_attribute ALTER COLUMN data_int TYPE BIGINT;Make sense?Thanks for the help!Luca postgresql db Related forum topics 2 replies Thursday 27 March 2014 3:35:34 pm Ok sorry...I understand that is a problem as old as time ...http://share.ez.no/forums/developer/attribute-of-type-date#comment49772 0 like Like it! Permalink Thursday 27 March 2014 8:28:51 pm Uhm... Same problem in eZInteger datatype, not only eZDate/eZDateTime!I cannot store an integer value greater
Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 30 Star 1,502 Fork 468 pat/thinking-sphinx Code Issues 13 Pull requests 0 Projects 0 Pulse Graphs New issue postgres: integer out of range #610 Closed igorbernstein opened this Issue Sep 17, 2013 · 8 comments Projects None yet Labels None yet Milestone No milestone Assignees No one assigned 4 participants igorbernstein commented Sep 17, 2013 I think I found a regression related to: #97 When using deltas & rails fixtures with postgresql I get the error: "ERROR: index 'catalog_edition_core': sql_range_query: ERROR: integer out of range" I tracked the problem down to my sphinx.conf: sql_query = SELECT "catalog_editions"."id" * 4 + 0 AS "id"..... updating the sql_query to sql_query = SELECT "catalog_editions"."id"::bigint * 4 + 0 AS "id"..... fixes the issue. My temporary workaround is to monkey patch thinking sphinx: ThinkingSphinx::ActiveRecord::SQLBuilder.class_eval do def document_id quoted_alias = quote_column source.primary_key "#{quoted_primary_key}::bigint * #{config.indices.count} + #{source.offset} AS #{quoted_alias}" end end which obviously breaks mysql. Owner pat commented Oct 6, 2013 Are you finding this change still works for you? I've just created a test table which uses bigints for the primary key, and added a record with a very large id. Sphinx is happy indexing up to a point... but if the indices count or offset puts it over the 64 bit limit, then I get the error you mention, and your fix doesn't stop the error. My understanding is that the calculated value is too big for PostgreSQL, let alone Sphinx. pat closed this Oct 19, 2013 igorbernstein commented Oct 19, 2013 My apologies for the delayed response. Yes, my workaround is still working for me. Please note that my scenario is a bit different from yours....I'm not trying to use 64 bit indexes in postgres, I'm just trying to load fixture ids which are capped at 32 bits. So I'm well under the 64 bit limit in sphinx & postgres. http